Benfield UCL Hazard Research
Centre Hosts Urban Seismic Risk Workshop
Benfield UCL Hazard Research Centre (BUHRC) today hosted a one-day workshop
in London in association with the Under 35s Reinsurance Group at Lloyd's
entitled 'Shaking Cities: Current issues in urban seismic hazard and
risk'. The workshop brought together leading seismic hazard scientists
from around the world who gave presentations on a variety of current issues
in urban seismic hazard and risk of relevance to the insurance and reinsurance
industry. The event was attended by over 60 delegates from the industry
and academia.
Professor Bill McGuire, Director of the Benfield UCL Hazard Research Centre
said: 'The Kashmir earthquake, which killed more than 80,000 people almost
exactly a year ago, is testament to the increasingly lethal and destructive
capacities of large earthquakes in an ever-more crowded world. The research
results presented at the workshop form part of global initiative involving
engineers, seismologists and disaster managers which seeks to reduce seismic
risk in urban centres and prevent future earthquake disasters on the scale
of Kashmir'.
Topics and speakers on the day included:
- Shaking in the heart of Europe - 650th Anniversary of the
Basel 1356 Earthquake (Dr. Milan Simic, Benfield)
There has been much scientific debate about the source and magnitude
of the 1356 Basel earthquake which is an important reminder that Europe
has a high density of people and property in areas susceptible to earthquake
risk. Calculations of the potential losses from a repeat of the event
today are now possible using earthquake loss models.
- Engineering issues in urban seismic risk (Professor
Adrian Chandler, BUHRC, University College London)
An explanation of some general issues on seismic risk in dense urban
areas with specific examples of Hong Kong. It is argued that a broader
view is required on seismic hazard estimation, to include explicit consideration
of distant, large-M earthquakes. This is especially the case in regions
of low to moderate seismicity, where near-field hazard may not provide
the worst-case scenario event.
- China: seismic hazard and risk and Shanghai futures
(Dr. Paul Burton, BUHRC University of East Anglia)
Mass construction and rapid urbanisation is increasing China's exposure
to seismic threats. There is an increased awareness of the need to understand
how vulnerable people and property are to future earthquakes. In the
light of China's continuing boom, further progress in the assessment
of seismic risk is of paramount importance.
- Seismic hazard and risk assessment in South Africa
(Dr. Andrzej Kijko, Council for Geoscience, South Africa)
Modellers can face many problems during seismic hazard and risk analysis.
Techniques for their solutions providing a coherent methodology for
effective assessment of the risk and the application of the techniques
are presented using examples of South Africa and the New Madrid Seismic
Zone.
- Urban earthquake risk in Istanbul (Professor
Eser Durakal, Bogazici University, Istanbul)
The size of Istanbul as the economic, industrial and financial hub of
Turkey and the high population and number of buildings necessitates
the evaluation of direct and indirect losses from seismic events. The
likely consequences of a large seismic event near Istanbul on buildings,
industry and on the Turkish Catastrophe Insurance Pool (TCIP) are evaluated.
- Forward modelling of earthquake and tsunami hazard
(Professor John McCloskey, University of Ulster)
The devastating December 26th Sumatran earthquake triggered a tsunami
that took over a quarter of a million lives. This and a second major
quake on the same fault, in March 2005, has not - however - released
all the accumulated strain. Future major earthquakes in the region are
forecast to generate tsunami and their effects can be modelled.
- A displacement-based method for earthquake loss modelling
at variable geographical scales (Dr. Helen Crowley, University
of Pavia, Italy)
For many applications, including decision-making processes within the
insurance and reinsurance industries, it is necessary to estimate the
effects of many, or even all, possible future earthquake scenarios that
could impact upon an urban area. Multiple earthquake scenarios, used
to generate the ground motions at all sites of interest, and defined
through Monte Carlo simulations based on the seismicity model, is the
most conceptually sound method to represent the seismic hazard in a
loss model when considering the effects at multiple sites simultaneously.
- Assessing the seismic vulnerability of urban areas (Dr.
Tiziana Rossetto, BUHRC, University College London)
In most cases it is not the ground shaking itself that causes life and
economic loss from earthquakes but the collapse or damage of buildings
and infrastructure that are too "weak" to resist the ground shaking.
Tools can be used to evaluate a building's vulnerability to earthquakes
and their limitations.
For further information, please contact:
Katie Stott
Benfield (UK)
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7578 7180
katie.stott@benfieldgroup.com
Professor Bill McGuire
Benfield UCL Hazard Research Centre
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7679 3637
w.mcguire@ucl.ac.uk
Chris Gatland
Benfield (UK)
Tel: +44 (0) 20 7578 7485
chris.gatland@benfieldgroup.com
«back to top«
|
|