|
Geological events over the past 12 months were dominated by
the Magnitude 7.6 Kashmir earthquake on October 8th 2005 (figure
5), which devastated the region and took estimated
75 - 100,000 lives due to wholesale building collapse and massive
landslides in the unstable mountainous terrain. A summary of
the earthquake is published in EOS by Satoshi
Fujiwara 25 and colleagues at the Japanese
Geographical Survey Institute, while a detailed damage report
compiled by BUHRC’s Tiziana Rossetto
51 and others is available on the website of the
UK Institution of Structural Engineers. Extreme natural hazards,
including great earthquakes, volcanic super-eruptions, tsunamis
and asteroid impacts are comprehensively addressed in a special
issue of Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society
(A), edited by Herbert Huppert of Cambridge
University and Steve Sparks 31 of
the University of Bristol, and put together in the light of
the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami disaster. The volume also contains
a review paper by Bill McGuire 47
of the BUHRC, which reviews threat identification and assessment
in relation to global risk from extreme geophysical events.

Figure 5. The October 8th 2005, Kashmir earthquake occurred
105 km north of Islamabad at a depth of about 26 km. This magnitude
7.6 event occurred in a zone of high seismic hazard and took
up to 100,000 lives.
Courtesy: United States Geological Survey.
Earthquake prediction and forecasting
The idea that it might be possible to make use of precursory phenomena
to make a precise prediction of the timing, and perhaps even the
size, of a forthcoming earthquake remains attractive, even though
there has been little success in this area. A number of researchers
and research groups even claim to have successfully predicted
earthquakes in the past, the most famous example being the magnitude
7.3 Haicheng (China) earthquake of 1975. At the time, Chinese
officials claim to have saved countless lives by evacuating the
area based upon warning signs, but how does this claim stand up
to forensic examination? Kelin Wang 73
of the Geological Survey of Canada, teamed up with Chinese colleagues
to re-examine, in the Bulletin of the Seismological Society
of America, the Haicheng ‘prediction’ in the
light of recently-declassified documents. Wang and his team discovered
that two general, mediumterm forecasts were issued in the months
leading to the event, highlighting the threat of a possible magnitude
5-6 quake in the region within 1 - 2 years. These were driven
by monitored deformation of the ground surface, changes in groundwater
level, colour and chemistry, and - apparently - by anomalous animal
behaviour. Predictions of an imminent earthquake were also issued
on the day of the event, from a number of sources, but these were
driven solely by a sequence of strong foreshocks, without which
it is certain that no evacuation would have occurred. Unfortunately,
foreshocks do not occur before every earthquake, while significant
shocks may occur without a following main shock. It seems, then,
that the prediction was ‘successful’ more by luck
than judgement; a fact confirmed by the absence of a prediction
prior to the great Tangshan (China) earthquake the following year,
which took up to 600,000 lives.
The search for more reliable earthquake precursors continues,
however, and for some time there has been interest in electromagnetic
(EM) signals within the Earth’s crust that have been reported
prior to earthquakes. In a paper published in Geophysical
Research Letters, Minoru Tsutsui 71
of Kyoto Sangyo University (Japan), reports the development
of a boreholebased system capable of detecting extremely low
frequency (ELF) EM pulses, and its use in detecting an intense
EM pulse at the time of a magnitude 5.5 earthquake, and originating
at the quake’s epicentre 130 km distant. Given the near
simultaneous occurrence of the quake and the pulse, there would
seem to be limited scope for using such a system as a predictive
tool. Tsutui points out, however, that more research needs to
be undertaken into the relationship between EM pulses and earthquakes.
As it seems likely that the pulses represent a so-called ‘piezoelectric
effect’, caused by the pressurisation or shearing of rock,
the detection of EM pulses may prove useful in monitoring movements
within the crust that precede an earthquake, providing at least
the potential for useful prediction.
Earthquake forecasting, as opposed to prediction, involves a
broad assessment of the likelihood of a forthcoming quake. Earthquake
forecasts are often probabilistically-based, for example in
relation to the average return period of a particular size quake.
A forecast may also be predicated or modified on the basis of
observations that might point to the possibility of a coming
quake, but without providing any information on timing. Examples
include deformation of the ground surface or patterns of small
earthquakes. In the journal Nature, Joanne
Bourgeois 10 of the University of Washington
(Washington State, US) addresses tell-tale surface deformation,
which seems to precede past great earthquakes in the Alaska
and Cascadia Subduction Zones off the west coast of North America.
It has been known for some time that major subduction zone earthquakes
are accompanied by significant co-seismic subsidence. For example,
the 1964 Moment Magnitude 9.2 Alaska earthquake resulted in
between 1 - 2 m of subsidence along the coast, with similar
effects recorded along the Washington coastline following the
1700 c. magnitude 8.7 - 9.2 Cascadia earthquake. Bourgeois,
however, reviews new studies that seem to have picked up a degree
of subsidence before each of these great seismic events.
The amount of subsidence, determined on the basis of examination
of key species of microfossils in the coastal environments,
appears to be on the order of 10 - 30 cm, and - prior to the
Alaska 1964 event - seems to have started about a decade before
the quake. Although the results and their significance remain
a matter for debate, one possible cause of the subsidence is
the occurrence of so-called ‘slow earthquakes’ deeper
down in the subduction zones, which release their energies over
periods of weeks, rather than minutes, and are thus difficult
to detect using seismometers. Worryingly, such events have been
detected in the Cascadia Subduction Zone since 1992, using GPS.
Could this mean that an imminent great Cascadia earthquake is
on its way?
Seismic hazard in California
One hundred years after the Great San Francisco earthquake,
and 12 years on from Northridge, Californians are getting jumpy
about when and where the next ‘big one’ will happen.
Far more is now known about Californian earthquakes than just
12 years ago, let alone the beginning of the last century, and
much of this is down to what is known as the Parkfield Earthquake
Prediction Experiment (PEPE). Twenty years ago the 40 km long
Parkfield section of the San Andreas Fault was recognised as
a promising seismic laboratory where a future quake was almost
certain to happen within decades. As a consequence, the section
was intensively instrumented so that when the quake did finally
occur, detailed observations could be made. The magnitude 6.0
Parkfield earthquake happened on September 28th, 2004 (figure
6), providing a wealth of data and pointing up major
implications for earthquake prediction and hazard assessment
in the state. William Bakun 5 of
the United States Geological Survey, and colleagues, summarise
the findings of the PEPE in an article in Nature. One of the
most striking features of the Parkfield quake was the lack of
detectable precursors, despite the fault rupture occurring in
the middle of a dense network of instruments. While identical
foreshocks occurred prior to Parkfield earthquakes in 1934 and
1966, none preceded the 1901 and 1922 events. Neither did any
foreshocks precede the 2004 event, with not even any micro-seismicity
being recorded in the six days up to the quake. Several strain
meters recorded subtle strain changes in the 24 hours before
the quake, but although these provided information on the physics
of the earthquake, they were too small to form a basis for warning
that a potentially damaging quake was imminent. Notwithstanding
an absence of sufficiently robust precursors to make a prediction
of the Parkfield 2004 event, Bakun and his co-authors stress
that a huge amount of useful data was gathered. This is addressed
in some detail in the paper, with particular attention paid
to the structure of the fault, prediction of damaging ground
motion, the long-term randomness of earthquakes, and implications
for future research.

Figure 6. The Parkfield earthquake of September 28th 2004,
showing the main Moment Magnitude 6.0 shock, and aftershocks
that occurred over in the following 33 hours.
Courtesy: United States Geological Survey.
Southern California appears to have been a focus of attention
for researchers over the past 12 months, and two papers highlight
concerns that a large earthquake is due in the region. Writing
in Nature, Yuri Fialko 23
of the University of California at San Diego, reports the results
of a satellite-based survey of deformation along the southern
part of the San Andreas Fault, where no large earthquake has
occurred for at least 250 years. Assuming an average slip rate
of a few centimetres a year, which characterises the rest of
the San Andreas Fault, Fialko estimates that between 7 and 10
m of slip deficit has been accrued along the southern section
of the fault. In other words, deep within the crust, this much
movement has occurred along the fault, but at shallower depths
the fault has been locked, leading to an enormous build-up in
strain. Fialco estimates that this degree of slip deficit is
on a par with the maximum experienced between quakes, and is
sufficient to trigger a magnitude 8 earthquake should all strain
be released in one go.
The seismic threat to southern California is also highlighted
in a second paper, published in Geophysical Research Letters
by Kim Olsen 49 of San Diego State
University, and co-workers. Olsen and his colleagues note that
the southernmost section of the San Andreas Fault has a high
probability of rupturing in a large earthquake (> magnitude
7.5) in the next few decades. To constrain better the expected
strong ground shaking that is likely to result, the authors
have simulated the effect of the underlying geology, and have
come up with worrying results. A chain of sediment-filled basins
between San Bernardino and downtown Los Angeles act as waveguides,
which channel surface seismic waves along the southern edge
of the San Bernardino and San Gabriel Mountains. During a future
earthquake, this will lead to unusually high, long-period ground
motions over much of the greater Los Angeles region. While major
damage can be expected, the authors note that it is fortunate
that the locations of many high-rises, such as downtown Los
Angeles, Long Beach and Santa Monica, are outside the predicted
areas of strongest shaking, as tall buildings are most susceptible
to such long-period waves.
Latest news from the New Madrid Seismic Zone
Earthquakes in the New Madrid Seismic Zone (NMSZ) (figure
7), in the central United States, are far less frequent
then those of California, but they have the potential to be
at least as damaging and lethal. A prerequisite for large, frequent
earthquakes is the rapid accumulation in the crust of a significant
amount of strain energy. This process readily occurs along the
boundaries between the Earth’s tectonic plates, for example
along California’s San Andreas Fault and Turkey’s
North Anatolian Fault. Away from plate margins, in intra-plate
settings, rapid strain accumulation is more difficult, and at
New Madrid its occurrence has been disputed. Bob Smalley
63, and co-workers, at the University of Memphis,
however,

Figure 7. (Left). Shake map for the Moment Magnitude 7.3
New Madrid earthquake of December 15th 1812, showing the enormous
extent of ground shaking compared to the samesized Landers (California)
quake of May 28th, 1992 (a).
(Right). Map of the New Madrid and neighbouring Wabash Valley
seismic zones shows earthquakes as circles. Red circles indicate
earthquakes that occurred from 1974 to 2002 with magnitudes
larger than 2.5 located using modern instruments (University
of Memphis). Green circles denote earthquakes that occurred
prior to 1974. Larger earthquakes are represented by larger
circles.
Courtesy: United States Geological Survey
announce in Nature, evidence for rapid strain rates
in the NMSZ. Smalley and his team report the detection, using
a continuously-recording GPS network, of surface movements of
up to a few millimetres a year. Such movements reflect strain
rates that are comparable in magnitude to those observed at
plate boundaries, and which are consistent with known faults
in the region. The authors note that the explanation for the
surface movements is problematical. The movements, for example,
are spatially confined, possibly suggesting that the driving
force of New Madrid earthquakes is local rather than regional,
but the source of which remains to be unequivocally determined.
One possibility is that the movements represent some long-term
post-seismic ‘settling’ process following the major
1811-12 event, although the time span since is unusually lengthy.
Whatever the cause of the surface movements, and associated
strain accumulation, Smalley and his colleagues rightly note
that their detection makes an important contribution to the
ongoing debate in relation to seismic hazard and risk in the
NMSZ. As a footnote, the results of Smalley’s team have
been disputed by Eric Calais 12
of Purdue University, and colleagues, who address alternative
interpretations of the deformation data, and their comments
and Smalley’s reply are also published in Nature.
New probabilistic seismic hazard assessment
for greater Tokyo
Writing in the Extreme Natural Hazards special issue of Philosophical
Transactions of the Royal Society (A), Ross Stein
66 of the United States Geological Survey, and colleagues,
present a new probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for greater
Tokyo, based upon a joint Japanese - US study. With major, destructive
earthquakes striking the Japanese capital in 1703, 1855 and
1923, concern is growing about the nature, timing, size and
impact of the next one. To try and answer these questions, Stein
and his group used the prehistoric record of great earthquakes
preserved by uplifted marine terraces and tsunami deposits,
a newly digitized dataset of historical shaking, the dense modern
seismic network, and Japan’s GeoNet array to comprehensively
reinterpret the tectonic structure, identify active faults and
their slip rates and estimate their earthquake frequency. On
the basis of these new data, the authors determine that the
likelihood for severe shaking (ca 0.9g peak ground acceleration
(PGA)) in Tokyo, Kawasaki and Yokohama for the next 30 years
is c. 29 percent, which corresponds to an annual probability
of about 1.2 percent. Based upon a US$1 trillion estimate for
the cost of a future Magnitude 7.3 shock beneath Tokyo, Stein
and his co-researchers note that the annual probable loss for
the Japanese government is US$12 billion.
National studies of seismic hazard and risk
Three studies, published in the journal Natural Hazards,
and focusing on aspects of country-wide seismic hazard and risk
are summarised here. The first, by Jochen Schwarz
61, and colleagues, at the Bauhaus - Universität,
Weimar, involves comparative seismic risk assessments in Germany,
using the European Macroseismic Scale (EMS-98). The authors
apply a GIS-based seismic risk assessment to two communities,
Schmölln in eastern Thuringia, representing one of the
country’s many small towns, and the city of Cologne, as
representative of the larger urban centres. One of the paper’s
conclusions is that, for stronger earthquakes, damage will be
greater in small towns such as Schmölln, due to increased
vulnerability of the building stock and other factors, than
in larger cities exemplified by Cologne. The second, by Roberto
Romeo 56, of the University of Urbino, presents
an assessment of earthquake hazard in Italy for the period 2001
- 2030, on the basis of timedependent earthquake probabilities
determined from the historical catalogue. The main findings
of the study are: (i) seismic source zones in southern Italy
are the most prone to experience damaging quakes in the next
30 years, with conditional probabilities as high as 10 percent;
(ii) any influence exerted by earthquake interaction (for example
stress transfer) in increasing such probabilities, is too small
to be of importance. In the third paper, Wen-Yu Jean
33 of Taiwan’s National Center for Research
on Earthquake Engineering, and co-researchers, describe a system
designed to produce shake maps that provide rapid estimates
of strong ground shaking due to earthquakes in Taiwan. The high
resolution, near-real time, output incorporates local site effect
influences on ground shaking, and generates early estimates
of potential damage for emergency response services.
Earthquake loss estimation and damage assessment
Catastrophe models of earthquakes now underpin and inform most
decisions made by insurers and reinsurers who have vested interests
in areas of high seismic hazard and risk. They also have an
important role to play, however, in designing building codes
and guiding emergency planners and response agencies. Building
a loss model, whether for a city, a region or a country, involves
compiling databases of past earthquake activity, ground conditions,
attenuation equations, building stocks, infrastructure exposure,
and vulnerability characteristics. Inevitably, large uncertainties
are involved that result in any model constructed being poorly
constrained. Many uncertainties, however, can be regarded as
epistemic, in the sense that they can be reduced - in theory
at least - through a better understanding of the physical processes
involved or the acquisition of better data. In a paper published
in Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics,
Helen Crowley 17 of the European
School for Advanced Studies in Reduction of Seismic Risk (Pavia,
Italy), and colleagues, examine the possible impact of epistemic
effects on earthquake loss models, by introducing systematic
variations into a test case of buildings along the northern
shore of the Marmara Sea in Turkey.
In a second paper, in the journal Bulletin of Earthquake
Engineering, that continues the uncertainty theme, Crowley
teams up with Julian Bommer 9 of
London’s Imperial College, to examine the influence of
ground-motion variability in earthquake loss modelling. Bommer
and Crowley note the often large uncertainties associated with
input parameters, such as the seismicity itself, ground motion,
and the exposure and vulnerability characteristics of the building
stock, have to be reduced if any meaningful result is to be
derived from an earthquake catastrophe loss model. This, propose
the authors, can only be accomplished by first correctly identifying
and characterising these uncertainties, and then by incorporating
them into the calculations and interpreting the output taking
into account their influence. One important element of uncertainty,
in all earthquake loss models, will be the aleatory variability
in ground motion prediction. Spurning more traditional approaches
to this uncertainty, the authors propose that the only approach
that is consistent with the real nature of ground-motion variability,
is to model the shaking component of the loss model through
generating large numbers of synthetic earthquake scenarios,
which sample the magnitude and spatial distributions of the
seismicity, and also the distribution of ground motions for
each event, as defined by the aleatory variability.
Crowley and Bommer 18
also collaborate in another Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
paper, which examines the modelling of seismic hazard in earthquake
loss models with spatially distributed exposure. The prediction
of possible future losses from earthquakes that can affect structures
over a wide area is of critical importance to national and local
governments, emergency planners, and to insurers and reinsurers.
The authors propose two ways of tackling the problem; one involves
generating loss exceedance curves by performing independent
probabilistic seismic hazard assessment calculations at several
locations simultaneously, and then combining the losses at each
site for each annual frequency of exceedance. The other entails
using multiple earthquake scenarios to generate ground motions
at all sites of interest, defined through Monte Carlo simulations
based on the seismicity model.
Where the underlying geology is soft sediment or landfill, liquefaction
can play a major role in building loss and damage. In Soil
Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Juliet Bird
8 of Arup Geotechnics, and colleagues, address the
issue of modelling liquefaction in earthquake loss models, wherein
large variations in building stock and ground conditions need
to be considered. The authors discuss the main modes of building
response to a range of uniform and differential ground movements,
and examine the uncertainties involved. They propose a unified
damage scale with application to both reconnaissance and assessment
of all modes of buildings damage, and examine the interaction
of ground shaking and liquefaction in relation to induced structural
damage. Bird and her co-workers conclude that incorporating
liquefaction damage into an earthquake loss model is complex;
failing to do this, however, may result in significant errors
in resulting damage estimations.
Tsunami hazard and risk in the major ocean
basins
Less than two years after the December 26th 2004 Indian Ocean
tsunami, and with more than 500 lives lost due to another tsunami
that struck the Indonesian island of Java in July 2006, tsunami
risk and hazard continues to be a major research area. In a
new approach to the subject, Eric Geist and
Tom Parsons 27, of the United States Geological
Survey, propose - in the journal Natural Hazards -
the application of probabilistic analysis to tsunami hazard.
The authors note that most tsunami hazard assessments tend to
rely upon deterministic or scenario-type models, for example
based upon inundation maps derived from the maximum credible
tsunami for a particular location or region. While Geist and
Parsons accept that some intuitive measure of probability is
involved in assigning a maximum credible tsunami, they feel
that a more overt probabilistic model is more appropriate, not
only in explicitly defining the probability associated with
any individual scenario, but also because this enables the determination
of an annualised risk, which is of particular use to insurers.
In this context, the authors present in the paper a methodology
for Probabilistic Tsunami Hazard Analysis (PTHA), along the
lines of the Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis (PSHA) that
is now in common use. Geist and Parsons present two-case studies;
firstly a site-specific hazard analysis applied to Acapulco
(Mexico), and secondly, a region-wide analysis of the tsunami
threat presented to the US west coast by tsunamis generated
in the Cascadia Subduction Zone.
Two further papers in Natural Hazards zero in on tsunami
risk in the Pacific Basin, which hosts most of the world’s
lethal and destructive tsunamis. In the first, Yoshiki
Yamazaki 77 and colleagues at the University
of Hawaii, present a forecasting model for earthquake-generated
tsunamis generated in the Japan-Kurile-Kanchatka Subduction
Zone of the NW Pacific, with particular emphasis on the threat
posed to the Hawaiian Islands. On the basis of seismic data
over the past century, the authors divide the subduction zone
into more than 200 separate ‘sub-faults’, along
which synthetic tsunami waveforms or ‘mareograms’
are generated for existing tide gauges and tsunami warning buoys
in the region. The authors ran the model to simulate two historical,
tsunamigenic events in the subduction zone, the 1944 Tonankai
earthquake and the 1994 Kurile earthquake, and report good agreement
between predicted and actual tsunami heights at tide gauges
around the Hawaiian Islands. In the second paper, Byung
Ho Choi 16 of Sungkyunkwan University in
South Korea, and co-workers, use a synthetic catalogue to estimate
tsunami risk along coastlines adjacent to the Japan Sea. The
synthetic catalogue is adopted as a way of getting around a
paucity of observational data, and is used to develop a range
of possible tsunami scenarios. The catalogue includes just four,
real (20th century) events, together with 24 hypothetical tsunamigenic
earthquakes, located in ‘seismic gaps’, and a further
76 earthquake tsunami sources distributed across the eastern
part of the Japan Sea, which is the main source of distant tsunamis
affecting Korea and Russia. Tsunami wave-heights are calculated
and used to determine tsunami risk zones in the region.
Switching to the Atlantic Basin, which hosts just two percent
of recorded tsunamis, but where the potential for rare but severely
damaging events remains real, César Andrade
1 of the University of Lisbon, and colleagues, focus
on evidence for historical tsunamis in the Azores. Like the
Hawaiian Islands, the Azores - by virtue of their mid-ocean
location, are particularly vulnerable to tsunamis, either generated
locally or remotely. Andrade and his fellow researchers report
that since the archipelago was settled in the 15th century,
its coasts have been struck by 23 tsunamis. The most damaging
resulted from the great Lisbon earthquake in 1755, which generated
tsunamis with an 11 - 15 m run-up on the island of Terceira.
The authors also point out that a number of ‘floods’
attributed to intense Atlantic storms, may have been tsunamis
arising from large sub-marine landslides in the region, and
warn that a future event on the scale of the 1755 tsunami, would
be extremely damaging and costly.
Tsunamis generated by
landslides and other non-seismic sources

Figure 8. Tsunami damage to shore properties caused by the
landslides at
Stromboli volcano on December 30th 2003.
Courtesy: Tom Pfeiffer
The great majority of tsunamis result from large, shallow, submarine
earthquakes. Others, however, arise from submarine landslides,
from exploding or collapsing volcanoes or, even, from very rare
asteroid or comet impacts in the ocean. The most recent damaging
landslide-generated tsunamis, were sourced as recently as December
2002, when masses of rock totalling up to 30 million cubic metres,
slid from the flanks of the Stromboli volcano, north of the
island of Sicily in the Mediterranean. The events are described
in a pair of papers by Stefano Tinti 67,
68 of the University of Bologna, and published in Bulletin
of Volcanology, one addressing the physical effects, and
the other presenting the results of numerical simulation of
the events. Tinti and his colleagues describe the formation
of two tsunamis, a couple of hours apart, which caused severe
damage to property around the Stromboli coast, and also damaged
buildings on the island of Panarea, 20 km distant. The waves
were also detected across the region, including along the north
coast of Sicily and on the Calabrian and Campanian coasts of
the Italian mainland. For Stromboli, the authors report run-up
heights of up to 10.9 m, which led to the complete destruction
of some buildings close to the sea and severe damage to others
(figure 8). At Panarea, a 2.3 m run-up resulted
in minor damage to coastal properties and structures. Although
only three injuries resulted from the waves, a much higher toll
would probably have resulted if the waves had struck at the
height of the holiday season, when many more sea-front properties
would have bee occupied. Tinti and his colleagues, point to
the fact that similar landslide-generated tsunamis may have
occurred on as many as six occasions since 1919, and caution
that this continues to be a threat to those living around the
coasts of Stromboli island.
Tsunami-producing landslides from active volcanoes can be far
larger than those generated at Stromboli, and Eli Silver
of the University of California, Santa Cruz, Simon Day
62 (currently at BUHRC), and others, describe the
largest such event in historical times in EOS. In 1888,
the Ritter Island volcano, in Papua New Guinea, catastrophically
shed around five cubic km of rock into the sea, resulting in
tsunamis up to 20 m high that may have taken more than 2,000
lives. Silver and colleagues, describe the results of a recent
scientific cruise to the Ritter Island area, including submarine
imagery of the landslide deposits. They also report up to a
dozen debris field adjacent to other volcanoes in the Bismarck
Volcanic Arc, providing testament to a history of past landslides
in the region. The authors flag their study as the first step
in estimating the regional risk from volcanogenic tsunamis,
but also stress its importance in constraining computer simulations
for future tsunami-generating volcano collapses. Tsunamis also
result from giant sediments slides in the marine environment,
often triggered by the ground shaking associated with large
earthquakes. This is a hazard addressed by Koji Minoura
48 of Tohoko University (Japan) and co-researchers,
for the Marmara Sea immediately south of Istanbul. The authors
report the discovery of a layer of sand, shell debris and charcoal,
along the northern coast of the Marmara Sea, which they interpret
as providing evidence of an 11th century tsunami that inundated
the adjacent coastal plain to a distance of several hundred
metres. Minoura and colleagues relate the event to coastal or
submarine sediments slides caused by an earthquake on the North
Anatolian Fault (NAF). They note that a similar mechanism may
have generated tsunamis following an earthquake in 1912, and
warn that the awaited NAF earthquake, below the eastern Marmara
Sea could trigger a tsunami capable of impacting on the heavily
populated and industrialised areas around its shores (figure
9).

Figure 9. During the August 17th 1999 Izmit earthquake,
the town of Degirmendere on Izmit Bay (Marmara Sea) was inundated
by tsunamis due to a 2 m sudden and permanent subsidence of
the area. Minoura and colleagues (2005) report similar behaviour
during historic earthquakes on the North Anatolian Fault, and
warn of a similar threat during the forthcoming Istanbul quake.
Courtesy: NOAA National Geophysical Data Centre.
On a broader scale, Angus Best 7
of the UK’s National Oceanography Centre (Southampton),
and colleagues, writing in EOS, draw attention to the
growing threat to coastal zones - over the next 100 years -
arising from submarine landslides and their potential tsunamigenic
potential. The problem lies with seafloor sediments that contain
abnormally high levels of methane gas, generated by the breakdown
of organic detritus. Higher levels of methane in such sediments
are being promoted by human activities, which increase the supply
of sediments and organic matter through intensive farming, deforestation
and the disposal of human waste at sea. The authors point out
that shallow, methane-rich, sediments have the potential to
destabilise seabed slopes quite close to shore, with collapse
triggered by heavy rainfall, earthquakes or even human activities.
Resulting tsunamis, Best and his co-authors note, pose a serious
threat not only to coastal settlements but also to offshore
drilling operations, pipelines, power and communications cables,
and wind farms. Best and colleagues warn that a dramatic increase
in seafloor methane, resulting in instability of the continental
slopes, will occur when the current high levels of human activity-related
organic matter reaching the sea floor, become buried to ~ 1m
depth, probably within the next 100 years.
While extremely rare, our planet is certain to be struck by
a comet or asteroid at some point in the future. More likely
than not, the impact will occur in the ocean, where it will
have the potential to trigger devastating tsunamis. This is
a scenario addressed in Natural Hazards by Steven
Chesley of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory in
California, and Steven Ward 15,
of the University of California at Santa Cruz. In a quantitative
and economic assessment of the threat from asteroids less than
2 km across, they determine that averaged over time, around
180 people annually will be affected by impact-induced waves,
with corresponding infrastructure loss estimated at US$18 per
M/y. Chesley and Ward define a ‘mean generic scenario’,
within which tsunamis arising due to the impact will affect
1.1 million people and destroy US$110 billion of infrastructure.
A generic impact of a 400 m diameter asteroid (such as Asteroid
Apophis, which has a 1 in 38,000 probability of striking the
Earth in 2036), is estimated by the authors to be capable of
generating tsunamis that would cause a US$400 billion loss.
Predicting volcanic eruptions
Unlike earthquakes, volcanic eruptions never occur without some
or other warning sign. These arise because rising magma needs
to break rock to get to the surface, generating swarms of small
earthquakes, and also needs to make space for itself - causing
the ground surface above to swell. While the latter can be detected
using a range of technologies that include the Global Positioning
System, the former can be monitored using a system of seismographs.
In a paper published in Geophysical Research Letters,
Chris Kilburn and Peter Sammonds
36 of the BUHRC, show how measuring the daily numbers
of earthquakes can provide an important eruption precursor at
volcanoes reawakening after an extended period of quiescence.
The authors concentrate on andesitic-dacitic volcanoes that
have been in a quiescent state for a century or more. Such volcanoes
are characterised by moderate to very large explosive eruptions,
and have the potential to seriously threaten adjacent communities.
Kilburn and Sammonds link accelerating seismic activity to fracturing
in the crust surrounding a pressurised magma reservoir (figure
10), and show that the final acceleration to eruption
develops over a period of 2 - 3 weeks. They point out, however,
that as a week or longer is needed to identify an accelerating
trend, seismic forecasts of eruptions after a long repose period
are unlikely to provide more than a few days warning, which
is probably not sufficient to permit effective mitigation plans,
such as large-scale evacuation. The authors suggest that the
reliable warning interval may be increased by means of future
improvements to their model, or by incorporating additional
geophysical or geochemical precursors, such as ground deformation
and changes in gas chemistry.

Figure 10. (a) Precursory seismicity develops within a restricted
volume (grey) between the magma reservoir (black) and the surface.
During a Preparation Stage (P), seismicity is controlled by
an increasing number of activated fractures. These eventually
unite to form a connected fracture across the seismic volume
(Unificatioin stage, U).
(b) Unification is characterised by a hyperbolic increase in
peak seismic event rate (black circles), corresponding in
(c) to a linear decrease in the inverse-rate minima (black circles
and broken line). The event rate data are for precursors to
the 1995 eruption of Soufriere Hills volcano, Montserrat, measured
from 00.00 h on November 1st 1995; lava emerged on November
15th.
Courtesy: Chris Kilburn.
Volcanic hazard and loss
models
Due to the absence of any major loss due to volcanic activity,
the development of volcanic hazard and loss models attracts
little more than passing interest within the insurance industry.
Models useful to the market continue to be constructed, however,
and will - undoubtedly - attract considerable interest once
a large volcanic loss is sustained or appears imminent. HRSR2006,
included a volcanic risk ranking for the New Zealand city of
Auckland. In the last 12 months, one of the papers co-authors,
Christina McGill 43, 44 at Macquarrie
University (Sydney), along with various colleagues, has published
two new papers in the Journal of Volcanology & Geothermal
Research, addressing volcanic hazard and loss as it relates
to Auckland. The first presents a probabilistic tephra-fall
(~ ash-fall) simulation for the city, which faces such a threat
both from a number of distant, large-volume volcanic centres
in the North Island, and also from smaller eruptions in the
Auckland Volcanic Field (AVF) itself. The authors note that
less than one percent of simulations from distant volcanoes
reached the Auckland region, and that, at just 1.6 mm, the mean
modelled tephra thickness for eruptions within the AVF, were
very small. McGill and her colleagues also stress, however,
that larger thicknesses are also possible, with simulated maximum
thicknesses from within the AVF of 150 mm, and from distant
volcanoes, 830 mm. Clearly, the realisation of such events,
although very rare, would have the potential to cause serious
damage in the Auckland region. In a second paper, McGill and
co-authors present VolcaNZ, a volcanic loss model for
Auckland based upon the predicted impact of the tephra fall
addressed in the first paper. The model calculates both structural
and non-structural damage to residential buildings and associated
clean-up costs using Monte Carlo simulation. Losses from all
simulations are plotted against calculated Average Recurrence
Intervals (ARIs) to produce loss curves. Structural damage does
not become apparent until ARIs of around 8,000 years, with a
NZ$1 billion loss due to structural damage expected every 35,000
years and a NZ$26 billion loss every 1 million years. Total
loss, including clean-up, is estimated at approximately NZ$210
for ARIs of 600 to 3,000 years, rising to NZ$10 billion at 100,000
years, and NZ$26 billion at 1 million years. McGill and her
colleagues warn, however, that as the model only considers residential
building damage and clean-up, these values greatly underestimate
total loss from the next volcanic event to affect the Auckland
region.
Large-scale hazard implications
of volcanic super-eruptions
Volcanic super-eruptions occur every 50,000 years or more, and
eject in excess of 1,000 cubic kilometres of debris. Much of
this takes the form of volcanic ash that can cover continent-sized
areas, as demonstrated by two super-eruptions at Yellowstone
(Wyoming, US) in the last two million years, and another at
Toba (Sumatra, Indonesia), around 74,000 years ago. Until recently,
no explanation existed for how single volcanic eruptions - however
big - could deposit ash across such huge areas. In Geophysical
Research Letters, however, Peter Baines and
Steve Sparks 4 of Bristol University provide
a possible answer. They propose that supereruption ash columns
are large enough to be affected by the Earth’s rotation via
the Coriolis Force. As a consequence they form gigantic, spinning
ash clouds that may reach diameters as great as 6,000 km in
as little as a few days, enabling ash to be deposited at the
surface across an entire continent. Furthermore, the authors
predict that rates of radial expansion and spinning may be as
fast as tens of metres a second, sufficient to carry larger
particles to greater distances from the erupting volcano.
In addition to their ability to deposit ash across vast distances,
volcanic super-eruptions are also implicated in triggering severe
episodes of global cooling. Such action is believed to be a
function of the loading of the stratosphere with sulphur aerosols,
which are particularly effective at reducing the amount of solar
radiation reaching the surface. In the journal Climate Dynamics,
Gareth Jones 34 of the UK Met Office
Hadley Centre, and colleagues, describe the climate changes
that ensue following a hypothetical super-eruption, simulated
using an appropriately-adapted general circulation model (figure
11). The predicted changes to the global climate are
dramatic to say the least, and include a near-surface temperature
fall of as much as 10 degrees C globally for a few months, and
a considerable deviation from normal temperatures lasting for
several decades. While the cooling appears to be insufficient
to trigger an ice age, at least for the parameters used in the
model, it does increase the extent of snow and ice cover to
a maximum of more than one third of the Earth’s surface.

Figure 11. Summary graphic of the major impacts to ocean
and nearsurface climatology, due to a super-eruption (as simulated
by Jones and others, 2005). Globally, temperatures fall by up
to 15ºC below normal for a while. Bold numbers on the continents
and oceans represent the maximum deviations from normal annual
temperatures for that area as a whole.
Courtesy: Gareth Jones.
Recently restless volcanoes
On average, around 50 volcanoes are in eruption every year.
Some, such as Etna in Sicily and Kilauea on Hawaii, are almost
continually active, while others may be erupting for the first
time following periods of quiescence lasting for decades, centuries
or millennia. Papers addressing three such awakening volcanoes
are highlighted here, with the intention of perhaps providing
advance warning of forthcoming eruptions. In EOS, Alicia
Garcia 26 of the National Museum of Natural
Sciences in Madrid, and co-workers, focus on monitoring the
reawakening of Teide volcano on the Canary Island of Tenerife.
With its summit located 7 km above the sea floor, Teide is the
third largest volcano on the planet. In recent times, the volcano
has erupted every century or so, the last time in 1909. At the
end of 2003 and into 2004, the authors point out that Teide
began to show signs of restlessness, including increased numbers
of earthquakes, more fumarolic (steam vent) activity, and carbon
dioxide gas releases. While it is perfectly possible that any
forthcoming erruption will be effusive, in other words will
involve the relatively quiet production of lava flows, it could
also be explosive. Garcia and her colleagues note that the last
explosive eruption here occurred around 1,500 years ago, and
a similar event today could have the potential to affect more
than 400,000 people.
Heading north to Iceland, one of the most volcanically-active
countries on the planet, Heidi Sousalu 64
of the Nordid Volcanological Center, and colleagues, report
in the Journal of Volcanology & Geothermal Research,
similar signs of a possible impending eruption at Katla in the
south of the island. The authors report that the volcano has
been restless since 1999, when abnormal seismic activity accompanied
a glacial flood from the vicinity of the volcano, which may
have been caused by a small sub-glacial eruption. In 2002, the
level of seismic activity rose dramatically and earthquakes
have occurred continuously ever since. Sousalu and her team
interpret the seismic activity in terms of a shallow, growing
dome of sticky ‘acid’ (silica-rich) magma that now threatens
an explosive eruption. This, say the researchers, could pose
a serious threat in this popular tourist region, particularly
if the eruption occurs during the summer season.
In the Cascades Range of the western United States, Mount St.
Helens remains active following its reawakening in October 2004,
and there are also concerns that another volcano in the range
may shortly erupt. This possibility is discussed by Dan
Dzurisin 19 and colleagues at the United
States Geological Survey, who report, in the Journal of
Volcanology & Geothermal Research, recent signs of unrest
at the Three Sisters volcanic centre in central Oregon. Inflation
of the ground surface at South Sister volcano, which has not
erupted for 2,000 years or more, has been observed since 1996,
and is summarised by Dzurisin and his team. Their interpretation
is that observed ground surface movements are the result of
an inclined slab of basaltic magma intruding the volcano at
a depth of around 6.5 km. Dzurisin and his co-workers estimate
that the magma accumulation rate is about five million cubic
metres a year, and suggest that such events are not that unusual,
probably occurring every few decades to centuries. They feel
that there is a low probability of a resulting eruption, but
warn that - should one occur - the consequences could be severe.
This is reflected in the fact that the USGS has updated its
volcanic assessment for the Three Sisters region, notified the
appropriate agencies and the public, and is working to put together
an emergency coordination and communication plan.
«back
to top«
|
Geological hazards
Earthquake prediction and forecasting
Seismic hazard in California
Latest news from the New Madrid Seismic Zone
New probabilistic seismic hazard assessment
for greater Tokyo
National studies of seismic hazard and risk
Earthquake loss estimation and damage assessment
Tsunami hazard and risk in the major ocean
basins
Tsunamis generated by
landslides and other non-seismic sources
Predicting volcanic eruptions
Volcanic
hazard and loss models
Large-scale hazard implications
of volcanic super-eruptions
Recently restless volcanoes
|