
Executive Summary
- Nearly twenty years ago, researchers at Macquarie University
in Australia, in what was later to become the insurance industry-sponsored
research centre known as Risk Frontiers, began compiling databases
on natural hazards and their impacts in Australia.
- Information extracted from scientific reports, government papers,
existing databases, and newspaper accounts was used to produce
integrated databases containing more than 5,000 hazard occurrences
and information about human deaths and damage to the built environment
resulting from nine natural perils - tropical cyclones, bushfires,
floods, wind gusts, tornadoes, hailstorms, earthquakes, landslides
and tsunami.
- Tropical cyclones and floods together account for more than
70% of known natural hazard deaths since the European colonisation
of Australia in 1788. Thunderstorms, particularly lightning, and
bushfires each account for 11 to 13% of deaths, indicating that
the other hazards considered have produced very few human deaths,
at least in the last 200 years.
- Death rates, per 100,000 population, have fallen by three orders
of magnitude in the last two centuries.
- A new building damage index has been compiled allowing easy
comparison of total damage to buildings from about 1,200 twentieth
century events.
- Tropical cyclones, floods, thunderstorms and bushfires produced
93.6% of known building damage, suggesting that geological, as
opposed to meteorological hazards, have been relatively unimportant
- at least in the period since 1900.
- Just 20 out of the 1,200 events contributed 50% of the total
building damage. This short list – six floods, five bushfire
days, four tropical cyclones, three thunderstorms and two earthquakes
– reinforces the view that natural hazards risk in Australia
is not dominated by just one or two natural hazards.
- Despite the wealth of data, deciding which part of Australia
is the most hazardous is not as simple as it sounds. Similarly,
determining which hazard will be the most important in
the next few decades is equally difficult.
«back to top«
|