Home Contact us Gallery Site Map Search  
 
   
About us Activities In the News Resource Centre People      
Publications | Education and Training | Current & Recent Projects | Events | Research Opportunities
   

Download manual
(964kb pdf)




Home

Introduction

Volcanic Hazards

Scientists
Scientists Page 13
Scientists Page 14
Scientists Page 15
Scientists Page 16
Scientists Page 17

Emergency Managers

The Media

Appendices
Communication During Volcanic Emergencies
An Operations Manual for the Caribbean

Scientists provide the information that guides the entire emergency response. This information is then presented to the EMC or its equivalent, which will decide on the appropriate emergency strategy. A clear focus on assessing the volcano's behaviour is therefore crucial. Distractions in deciding emergency management procedures are normally counter-productive, and so it is recommended that a single scientist is given responsibility to liaise with the EMC. This individual should sit on the EMC and work particularly closely with the EMC's science liaison officer. From the monitoring team's point of view, such an arrangement will allow the core of the scientific team can concentrate on monitoring the volcano.



Decide which scientist will liaise with the Emergency Management Committee and ensure that a good working relationship is established.

Agree responsibilities with the civil authorities. Remember that your role is to provide advice and not to take decisions about emergency responses.

Clarify with the EMC the format in which you will provide them with information.

Ensure that the EMC is familiar with possible eruption scenarios and their impact.

Offer aid in designing basic plans that can be activated rapidly once a crisis starts to develop.

Work with the EMC to develop hazard and risk zonation maps and an effective system of alert levels.

Offer to play an active role in helping to educate the public about the volcanic threat. Provide individuals to talk at public meetings, to schools and other institutions, and on radio and television. Offer your expertise in preparing and disseminating literature and encourage and take a full part in regular exercises and simulations.



Ensure that effective and reliable means of communication are established and maintained with the EMC. Bear in mind that eruptive activity

may make travel difficult and damage exposed phone lines and ensure that alternative methods - pagers and VHF radios - are available and used.

Draw up a timetable for regular meetings with the EMC science liaison officer. These should be at least daily and more frequently during periods of elevated activity or eruption.

Offer to the EMC, the services of your dedicated media spokesperson for press conferences and announcements, for drawing up information releases to the media and the public, and for making presentations to stakeholders such as aid agencies and chambers of commerce. Remember that your representative is charged with explaining the scientific basis for an emergency response and must avoid taking on any responsibility for emergency management decisions from the civil authorities.

Always listen to the concerns of the Emergency Management Committee.



NEVER with-hold information from the Emergency Management Committee.

DO NOT make decisions that might affect the welfare of the local population without the agreement of the EMC.

NEVER show your anger or frustration with the EMC. Remember they are required to make crucial, life-or-death decisions under conditions of extreme pressure.


Media attention is commonly a major distraction for the scientific monitoring team, so it is vital that a member of the team is given sole responsibility for liaising with the media. This individual should have good communication skills and previous experience of involvement with the media. Even so, it is likely that individual journalists and broadcasters will still attempt to approach and interview other members of the monitoring team, in part to obtain extra information, but also to find new and different 'angles' or to tease out an 'exclusive' story. In the latter cases, careless comments can be exaggerated to form the basis of a 'scoop', the gist of which is almost always negative and